ArticleInnovations in clinical neuroscience
Exploring Anticholinergic Burden in a Psychiatric Inpatient Population.
Article in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug Utilization, Anticholinergic Burden and Predictors of Length of Stay in a Psychiatric Hospital: A Retrospective Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMany psychiatric inpatients are prescribed complex medication regimens that include both psychiatric and medical drugs with high anticholinergic (ACH) activity. The cumulative ACH burden (ACB), arising from the pharmacodynamic additive effects of concomitant medication use, has been linked to a range of adverse effects. These include both short-term effects and long-term consequences. Our study aims to determine the degree of ACB in a psychiatric inpatient hospital using current measurement assessment tools.
methodsThis retrospective, observational study collected medication regimens and demographic data from the electronic health records of psychiatric inpatients. We included 250 adults aged 18 years or older who were institutionalized in a psychiatric hospital. The ACB was assessed using the ACH toxicity score (ATS), with data collected at two distinct time points, one in the spring and another in the winter, from different calendar years. The total ACB for both psychiatric and medical medications was compared across the patient population, analyzing the potential seasonal variation in the cumulative burden.
resultsThe degree of total ACB was not statistically significantly different (
conclusionThe prescribing of ACH medication did not significantly vary seasonally, however, most patients observed showed significant and consistent levels of ACB. It is recommended that clinicians should consider monitoring ACB in their prescribed regimens and consider pharmacologic strategies to reduce ACB. Risk reduction strategies include discontinuation of nonessential ACH medications or consideration of therapeutic interchange with an alternative agent with a lesser ACH profile. The deprescribing of long-term ACH medications for individuals who are otherwise clinically stable may improve both clinical outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42027357PMC13101900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.