Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027355›Full record

ArticleVisceral medicine2026

Endoscopic Therapy in Barrett's Esophagus.

Julia L Gauci, Roos E Pouw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visceral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia L GauciCentre for Liver and Digestive Disorders, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Roos E PouwDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is the standard of care for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Successful outcomes require a structured, evidence-based approach. Summary: Recognising and removing visible neoplasia is a crucial step in EET. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is efficient and safe for most dysplastic lesions, while endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection and more precise staging when submucosal invasion is suspected. Radiofrequency ablation remains the most established method for eradicating residual BE, with hybrid APC and cryoballoon ablation emerging as potential alternatives. Optimal therapy also depends on appropriate patient selection, multidisciplinary team involvement (MDT), effective acid control, and structured surveillance. Key Messages: (1) EET is effective, safe, and now central to managing dysplastic BE and early EAC. (2) High-quality optical diagnosis, careful technique selection, meticulous resection, and accurate histopathology assessment underpin good outcomes. (3) In most cases, ablation is recommended for durable remission, with RFA the first-line option. (4) Care is best delivered by specialist, multidisciplinary centres that adapt therapy to the individual patient within their wider clinical context.

Indexed as

Barrett’s EsophagusBarrett’s neoplasiaEndoscopic mucosal resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEsophageal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42027355
PMCPMC13102397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.