ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2026
Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Failure to Rescue in Patients Undergoing Distal Femur Fracture Fixation.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to evaluate the use of frailty, compared to age alone and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, for prediction of mortality and failure to rescue (FTR) in patients undergoing surgical fixation of distal femur fractures (DFFs). Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent surgical management of DFFs. Frailty was evaluated using the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and Risk Analysis Index (RAI). Outcomes included 30-day mortality and FTR (mortality following major complication). Multivariate regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were performed to assess odds ratio (OR) and discriminatory accuracy (quantified by C-statistic), respectively. Results: There were 2638 patients (median age 73 years) undergoing DFF fixation included in this study. Of these, 90 (3.4%) patients experienced mortality, while FTR occurred in 51 (1.9%) patients. Increasing frailty, as rated by the mFI-5 and RAI, was significantly associated with higher odds of 30-day mortality and FTR in patients undergoing surgical fixation of DFF. Additionally, RAI showed superior discriminatory accuracy for 30-day mortality and FTR compared to mFI-5, age, and ASA. Conclusions: The RAI demonstrates superior predictive value and discriminatory accuracy for postoperative mortality. Given these findings, frailty as measured by the RAI may be a useful bedside screening tool to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes. In doing so, patients can be optimized preoperatively to improve clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.