ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2026
What Women Want: A Call for Ergonomic, Equitable and Inclusive Orthopaedic Surgical Practice.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite gender parity in medical school enrolment, women remain underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery in India. Whilst structural barriers and implicit biases are increasingly acknowledged, less is known about the lived experiences and priorities of women navigating this field. This study seeks to capture the perspectives of female orthopaedic surgeons in India-their challenges, choices, and what they value in training and practice. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst 102 female orthopaedic surgeons across India, ranging from residents to senior consultants. A 43-item questionnaire assessed demographics, residency experience, intraoperative ergonomics, occupational health, psychosocial challenges, and perceived gender bias. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; qualitative responses were thematically coded. Agreement between self- and peer-perceived difficulty in trauma procedures was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa. Results: Only 24.5% reported no gender-based differences during training, whilst 71.8% felt seniors and peers lacked confidence in their surgical ability. Intraoperative difficulties such as poorly fitting lead aprons (64.7%) and radiation exposure (27%) were common. Occupational health issues like back (31.7%) and neck pain (27.6%) were frequently reported. Although trauma was of interest to many, 91.2% reported being discouraged from pursuing it, with key deterrents including work-life imbalance, radiation concerns, and lack of mentorship. Respondents also expressed a need for equitable surgical opportunities, institutional support, and gender-sensitive design in equipment and training environments. Conclusion: The findings reveal what female orthopaedic surgeons value in their professional journeys-supportive mentorship, equal access to operative roles, safe working conditions, and recognition as capable surgeons. Addressing these needs is critical to creating a more inclusive and forward-looking orthopaedic community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.