ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
DETECT-VTE: an audit of patients with venous thromboembolism and their characteristics in general practice in the United Kingdom.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a paucity of data informing the incidence and characteristics of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in primary health care. Objectives: The DETECT-VTE clinical audit explored the profile of patients with VTE in general practitioner (GP) practices in the UK. Methods: Data were audited from GP records of 687 adults with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), including their characteristics, health care service presentation locations and visit frequency, symptoms, vital signs, and risk factors with which they presented. Results: VTE (DVT, 49%; PE, 46%; both, 5%) was diagnosed in 180 individuals per 100,000 in the audited population between January and December 2023. VTE diagnosis was mostly initiated at GP practices (46%), with 62% of patients having multiple health care visits in the 8 weeks prior to the initiation of their diagnosis, although reasons for these visits were not captured. Common symptoms were painful and/or swollen legs in patients with DVT and chest pain and breathlessness in patients with PE, although several less common symptoms were observed. Key preidentified VTE risk factors reported in the audit included age ≥ 60 years and obesity, with patients aged ≥60 years frequently also exhibiting obesity, immobility, cancer, recent hospitalization, and previous VTE. Conclusions: The DETECT-VTE study emphasizes the role of GP practices in diagnosing VTE. While VTE diagnosis is typified by constellations of risk factors and symptoms, patient presentations can vary substantially. These findings reinforce the need for VTE vigilance in GP practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.