ArticleJournal of healthcare, science and the humanities2025
Beyond the Court-Compensation Inequality: A Critical Look at NIL for International Student-Athletes.
Article in Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper critically examines the National Collegiate Athletic Association's (NCAA) Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) policy and its inequitable impact on international student-athletes. The NCAA's NIL policy allows student-athletes to earn compensation from endorsements, marketing, and other activities, opening new opportunities for many athletes. However, international student-athletes face significant barriers to accessing these benefits due to immigration laws and institutional practices. Despite performing the same duties as their U.S. counterparts, international students are often prohibited from receiving direct compensation, which impedes their career development and financial stability. The paper explores the complexities of cross-cultural adjustment, career preparation challenges, and the limited support available to international student-athletes. It also addresses how the varying state-by-state interpretations of NIL policies further exacerbate these inequalities. While domestic student-athletes benefit from NIL deals, international athletes are left navigating a landscape filled with legal uncertainties, risking violating their visa statuses if they pursue compensation. Higher education institutions are recommended to create equitable practices that support international student-athletes. These include revising institutional policies to align with immigration laws, offering clear pathways for compensation through practical training programs, and increasing awareness of passive income opportunities. The need for consistent support from institutions and the NCAA is emphasized to ensure that international student-athletes are included in this new era of collegiate athletics. Ultimately, this paper calls for systemic changes that would allow international student-athletes to fully participate in NIL opportunities without fear of jeopardizing their immigration status, ensuring equity in compensation and career development for all athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42027230PMC13101414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.