ArticleJournal of healthcare, science and the humanities2025
Sedentary Behavior Affects the Ratings of Workplace Physical Activity Sessions.
Article in Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is not known how individuals with various levels of sedentary behavior rate their experiences with physical activity. The absence of these data diminishes the ability to tailor programs and interventions for those with different sedentary behavior patterns. We hypothesize that those who engage in greater levels of sedentary behavior will rate their experiences of workplace physical activity sessions less favorably than those who engage in lower levels of sedentary behavior. The study was a within subject, repeated-measures design. Sixty participants completed six distinct workplace physical activity sessions (i.e., 360 data points) and rated each session immediately after with self-report measures of social cognitive constructs (e.g., benefit, confidence, enjoyment, and likability). Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the data. Those who sat more than 6 hours/day on non-workdays rated sessions more favorably on enjoyment and likability constructs, but less favorably on confidence. Those who sat 10 hours/day on workdays rated physical activity sessions less favorably on the constructs of enjoyment and likability. Furthermore, sedentary behaviors had no effect on ratings of perceived benefits. Interventions designed to promote physical activity should assess sedentary behavior patterns (both workday and non-workday) and evaluate the effects on social cognitive perceptions of physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42027224PMC13101424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.