ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Real-world outcomes from 2,905 episodes of hospital at home care: a propensity-matched cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hospital at home (HAH) services within the UK have expanded rapidly over the last 5 years, but there is comparatively little evidence demonstrating their clinical effectiveness. In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive HAH service in England. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to our HAH service between December 2021 and May 2024, including pathways for heart function, airway disease, and acute respiratory infection. A 1:1 propensity score matched control cohort of patients admitted to inpatient care was created, using regression adjustment to derive doubly robust estimates of main outcomes. Primary outcomes included length of stay and total bed-day costs. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, 90-day mortality, and patient experience and acceptability metrics. Results: We analysed 2,972 HAH episodes, yielding, after exclusions, a total of 1,488 inpatient-originated (IP) episodes that were matched 1:1 to controls, as well as 754 admission prevention episodes for a separate analysis. HAH reduced length of stay compared with matched inpatient controls (bed-day savings: 3.13 days, 95% CI 2.60-3.67, Conclusions: This large real-world evaluation demonstrates that HAH services significantly reduce length of stay, readmissions, and healthcare costs while maintaining safety and possibly reducing mortality. These findings support a wider implementation of HAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.