Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Real-world outcomes from 2,905 episodes of hospital at home care: a propensity-matched cohort study.

Michael Shaw, Batool Almogheer, Dominique Auger, Andrew Barlow, Balasmita Bhaskaran, Maria Buxton, Marco Cerulli, Kalpana Giri Ghimire, Edward Hiller, Zoe Jayne and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael ShawWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Batool AlmogheerWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Dominique AugerImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew BarlowWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Balasmita BhaskaranWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Maria BuxtonCentral London Community Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Marco CerulliWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Kalpana Giri GhimireWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Edward HillerWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Zoe JayneCentral London Community Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Michal KellyEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Matthew KnightWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Eleanor Zinkin *West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
Niall G Keenan *West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hospital at home (HAH) services within the UK have expanded rapidly over the last 5 years, but there is comparatively little evidence demonstrating their clinical effectiveness. In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive HAH service in England. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to our HAH service between December 2021 and May 2024, including pathways for heart function, airway disease, and acute respiratory infection. A 1:1 propensity score matched control cohort of patients admitted to inpatient care was created, using regression adjustment to derive doubly robust estimates of main outcomes. Primary outcomes included length of stay and total bed-day costs. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, 90-day mortality, and patient experience and acceptability metrics. Results: We analysed 2,972 HAH episodes, yielding, after exclusions, a total of 1,488 inpatient-originated (IP) episodes that were matched 1:1 to controls, as well as 754 admission prevention episodes for a separate analysis. HAH reduced length of stay compared with matched inpatient controls (bed-day savings: 3.13 days, 95% CI 2.60-3.67, Conclusions: This large real-world evaluation demonstrates that HAH services significantly reduce length of stay, readmissions, and healthcare costs while maintaining safety and possibly reducing mortality. These findings support a wider implementation of HAH.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenesshospital at homelength of stayvirtual hospitalvirtual ward

Identifiers

PMID42027213
PMCPMC13101057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.