Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027145›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Performance evaluation of a clinical SPECT system with multifocal collimator for brain studies.

Tamaki Otani, Yamato Kunikane, Satoru Takashi, Shota Azane, Akihiko Fujita, Noritake Matsuda, Masafumi Amano

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tamaki OtaniDepartment of Medical Imaging/Nuclear Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Yamato KunikaneDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Satoru TakashiDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Shota AzaneDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Akihiko FujitaDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Noritake MatsudaDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Masafumi AmanoDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is an indispensable examination for evaluating brain function to diagnose dementia. During head examination, the collimator makes contact with the shoulders, which often causes the patient discomfort. A new multifocal high-resolution collimator (SMARTZOOM high resolution and extended [SZHRX]) can maintain image quality, even when there is distance between the patient and the collimator. Therefore, it may be a useful tool to prevent patient discomfort during head imaging. PURPOSE: In this study, we evaluated spatial resolution, sensitivity, uniformity, and %contrast in several basic experiments using different phantoms to clarify the image quality of the multifocal collimator.

methodsWe used

resultsFor both

conclusionsIt is possible to acquire images with high spatial resolution and uniformity, even if the rotation radius is widened by the use of SZHRX. The image quality of SZHRX obtained in this study will be helpful for future clinical applications.

Indexed as

BrainTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, Imagingmultifocal high‐resolution collimatorrotation radiusSPECT

Identifiers

PMID42027145
PMCPMC13107236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.