ArticleJournal of adolescence2026
Whose Care Matters? The Protective Role of Perceived Care in the Long-Term Physical Health Consequences of Adolescent Loneliness.
Article in Journal of adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Whose Care Matters? The Protective Role of Perceived Care in the Long-Term Physical Health Consequences of Adolescent Loneliness.Journal of adolescence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLoneliness has been associated with physical health outcomes, including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). While much of the research has focused on older adults, less is known about whether loneliness during adolescence is related to CVD risk later in life. This study addresses this gap by investigating the relationship between adolescent loneliness and CVD risk in adulthood, as well as the moderating role of different sources of perceived care.
methodsUsing data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), this study estimates school fixed effects models to examine the association between adolescent loneliness and adult CVD risk, measured using predicted 30-year hard CVD risk (major cardiovascular events) and full CVD risk (broader cardiovascular morbidity). School fixed effects models account for unobserved environmental confounders at the school and neighborhood levels. Interaction models were conducted to examine whether different sources of perceived care moderate the longitudinal relationship between loneliness and adult CVD risk.
resultsLoneliness during adolescence is positively associated with both hard and full CVD risk in adulthood. Perceived care from parents significantly attenuates this association, highlighting the distinct protective role of parental care in reducing the long-term health risks of adolescent loneliness. In contrast, perceived care from friends and teachers showed no significant moderating role.
conclusionsFamily-based interventions that strengthen parental emotional support and monitoring may be particularly effective in mitigating the cardiovascular risks associated with adolescent loneliness. Integrating family- and school-based strategies may further support adolescents' long-term physical health and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.