Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027118›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Proton therapy range uncertainty reduction using vendor-agnostic tissue characterization on a virtual photon-counting CT head scan.

Stevan Vrbaski, Goran Stanic, Silvia Molinelli, Mridul Bhattarai, Ehsan Abadi, Mario Ciocca, Ehsan Samei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stevan VrbaskiVinaver Medical, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Goran StanicVinaver Medical, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Silvia MolinelliCentro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Mridul BhattaraiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ehsan AbadiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mario CioccaCentro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Ehsan SameiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
European Union's Horizon 2020 101008548NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIH HHS P41EB028744NIH HHS R01EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhoton-counting CT (PCCT) is the latest technology enabling imaging with reduced noise and inherent spectral separation, with the potential to directly calculate a more accurate tissue stopping power from spectral data. This potential benefit is difficult to quantify in practice and is currently evaluated mainly in phantoms with simplified geometries that only approximate real patient anatomy. PURPOSE: In this work, we proposed virtual imaging simulators as an alternative approach to experimental validation of beam range uncertainty in complex patient geometry using a computational model of a human head and a CT system. In addition, we validate the accuracy of stopping power ratio (SPR) calculations on a model of a PCCT scanner using a conventional stoichiometric calibration approach and a prototype software TissueXplorer.

methodsA validated CT simulator (DukeSim) was used to generate PCCT projections of a computational head phantom, which were reconstructed with an open-source toolbox (ASTRA). The dose of 2 Gy was delivered through protons in a single fraction to target two different cases of nasal and brain tumors. The ground-truth treatment plan was made directly on the computational phantom using clinical treatment planning software (RayStation). This plan was then recalculated on the corresponding CT images for which SPR values were estimated using both the conventional method and the prototype software TissueXplorer. The resulting dose distributions were subsequently compared against the ground-truth plan to quantify dose differences arising from SPR estimation.

resultsThe mean percentage difference in estimating the SPR with TissueXplorer in all head tissues inside the scanned volume was 0.28%. SPRs obtained with this method showed smaller dose distribution differences from the ground truth plan than the conventional stoichiometric calibration method on the computational head phantom.

conclusionsVirtual imaging offers an alternative approach to validation of the SPR prediction from CT imaging, as well as its effect on the dose distribution and thus downstream clinical outcomes. According to this simulation study, software solutions that utilize spectral information hold promise for more accurate prediction of the SPR than the conventional stoichiometric approach.

Indexed as

HeadPhotonsProton TherapyTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedUncertaintyanthropomorphic phantomsphoton‐counting CTproton therapyradiotherapy treatment planningstopping power ratioTissueXplorer SPRvirtual imaging trials

Identifiers

PMID42027118
PMCPMC13244498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.