ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2026
Regional Standardization of CLL Management: Results of a Delphi Consensus Process.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been profoundly transformed by the introduction of Bruton tyrosine kinase and BCL-2 inhibitors. Despite improved survival outcomes, treatment selection remains complex, particularly in older patients with comorbidities, frailty, and increased infectious vulnerability. To address areas of clinical heterogeneity and support real-world decision-making, a two-round Delphi consensus process was conducted among 15 hematologists from 15 hematology departments across two Italian regions, Calabria and Sicily. A steering committee developed 12 statements covering key clinical and organizational aspects of CLL management, including infectious risk assessment, frailty evaluation, and the role of TP53 alterations in therapeutic choice. Agreement was assessed using a four-point Likert scale, with consensus predefined as ≥ 70% agreement or disagreement. All invited clinicians participated in both rounds (100% response rate). In the first round, consensus was achieved for 8 of 12 statements (66.7%). Following reformulation of unresolved items, two additional statements reached consensus in the second round. Overall, strong agreement was observed for five statements, while moderate convergence persisted for others. Panelists emphasized that infectious risk assessment should systematically inform treatment decisions and that structured frailty tools, including ECOG Performance Status and the Clinical Frailty Scale, may improve patient stratification. Although TP53 alterations were recognized as critical biological determinants, therapeutic decisions in older patients should balance genetic risk with age, comorbidities, frailty, and socioeconomic context. This regional initiative highlights priorities for patient-centered, multidimensional CLL management and may inform the development of optimized care pathways within coordinated regional networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.