ArticleAnesthesia and pain medicine2026
Assessment of changes in lung aeration and diaphragmatic function using ultrasonography in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a prospective observational study.
Article in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA few studies investigating the perioperative use of lung ultrasound (LUS) have shown loss of lung aeration with decline in diaphragmatic function after general anesthesia. We aimed to measure changes in lung aeration and diaphragmatic functions using LUS in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
methodsForty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled. For all patients, LUS examination was performed at 5 time points: preoperative room, after intubation, after deflation of pneumoperitoneum, 30 min after extubation, and 24 h post-extubation. The aeration loss was assessed using the modified LUS score. The diaphragmatic excursion was also evaluated preoperatively, and at 30 min and 24 h post-extubation.
resultsA progressive increase in modified LUS score was seen after intubation, after deflation of pneumoperitoneum, 30 min postoperative, after extubation and 24 h post-extubation at postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) as compared to preoperative room (P < 0.0001). The maximum modified LUS score was observed postoperatively after 30 min: 8 (5, 10) and 24 h post-extubation in PACU: 8 (4.25, 11.0). No significant change in the diaphragmatic excursion or respiratory complications was observed.
conclusionsOur study found a progressive loss of lung aeration after the induction of general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, extending up to the 24-h perioperative period. However, diaphragmatic excursion remained unchanged. The study also suggests that LUS is a valuable tool for detecting perioperative atelectasis and quantifying the aeration loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.