ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Structural dynamics and allosteric communication of a SARS-like bat coronavirus spike glycoprotein.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SARS-like bat coronaviruses (CoVs) pose ongoing public health risks due to their zoonotic potential, making it important to understand the molecular pathways that drive their evolution. We recently showed that SHC014-CoV can infect human cell lines in an angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)-dependent manner after acquiring two spike ectodomain mutations (F294L and A835D). However, how the wild-type (WT) SHC014 spike differs dynamically from these mutants remains unclear. Here, we built fully glycosylated ectodomain models of WT and three mutants (F294L, A835D, and the double mutant [DM]) and performed triplicate 1-μs all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for each variant. The two mutations exhibit epistasis, altering structural rearrangements relative to the WT. Notably, the DM receptor-binding domain (RBD) begins sampling the open conformation in our conventional MD. At the atomic level, the DM spike mitigates the dense negative packing introduced by A835D through a salt-bridge network, while F294L disrupts π-mediated interactions, together enhancing RBD opening propensity, which is critical for viral entry. Increased flexibility of the subdomain-2 "620-loop" further modulates DM RBD openness. Dynamical network analysis identified three allosteric communication pathways. In WT and F294L, "pathway 1" forms the baseline route linking the 620-loop to the RBD, whereas in A835D and the DM, it extends to the fusion peptide proximal region (FPPR), reshaping long-range communication. "Pathway 2" is conserved across variants but is most prominent in WT and F294L. "Pathway 3" appears only in A835D and the DM, compensating for reduced communication along pathway 2. Overall, this work provides an atomistic perspective on SHC014 molecular adaptation during host-to-host transmission and highlights mechanistic features that may inform future therapeutic and pandemic-preparedness efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.