Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026814›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of nursing practice2026

The Effect of Peanut Ball Use on the Labour Process and Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes in Parturient Women With High Maternal Body Mass Index: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fulden Ozkececi, Gulten Guvenc

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of nursing practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05276947 (The Effect of Peanut Ball Use on Labor Process and Maternal - Neonatal Outcomes in Obese Pregnants), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05276947 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Peanut Ball Use on Labor Process and Maternal - Neonatal Outcomes in Obese Pregnants

TypeinterventionalSponsorGulhane Training and Research HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsLabor LongArmsposition with peanut ball
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fulden OzkececiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3305-7516
Gulten GuvencDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Gulhane Faculty of Nursing, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-9497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of using a peanut ball in different positions on the labour process, maternal and neonatal outcomes for parturient women with high maternal body mass index.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2022 and August 2023 with 59 parturient women. The intervention group (n = 29) was positioned with a peanut ball for 30 min every hour until cervical dilatation reached 5-10 cm. No intervention was made for the control group (n = 30). Data collection tools included the Birth Satisfaction Scale and pain assessment using the visual analogue scale.

resultsThe mean body mass index was 36.2 and 35.9 kg/m

conclusionIncreasing use of peanut balls in parturient women with high maternal body mass index may decrease labour pain and improve satisfaction with the labour process.

trial registrationIt was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in March 2022 (NCT05276947). The trial protocol and statistical analysis plan can be accessed through the registry entry.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexLabor, ObstetricPregnancy OutcomeAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancychildbirthlabourobesityobstetricspainpatient satisfactionpeanut ball

Identifiers

PMID42026814
PMCPMC13106928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.