ArticleGut microbes2026
Gene-level gut microbiome signatures as predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple cancer types.
Article in Gut microbes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity in triple-negative breast cancer: a mini-review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Causal AI for cancer immunotherapy: a narrative framework review of target trial emulation, treatment-effect learning and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has improved survival across multiple cancer types, but the variability in patient response highlights the need for better predictive biomarkers. Existing studies rely on taxonomic abundance derived from reference genome databases, limiting the discovery and functional interpretation of uncharacterized microbes. Here, we integrated metagenomic data from multiple ICI-treated cohorts spanning diverse cancer types and geographic regions and developed a deep learning model, named BioP-VAE, that incorporates biological prior knowledge via protein sequence embeddings and uses gene-level microbial abundance features as input. Gene-level microbial abundance outperformed taxonomy abundance in predicting both ICI response and 12-month progression-free survival (PFS). In patients receiving combination immune checkpoint blockade (CICB), BioP-VAE achieved a mean AUC of 0.89 in intracohort and 0.88 in cross-cohort evaluation. Notably, in the monotherapy-treated intracohorts, BioP-VAE achieved a mean AUC of 0.97. Feature attribution analysis revealed key microbial genes. Additionally, we identified distinct predictive microbial signatures via age-stratified analysis, suggesting that host age may modulate microbiome‒immune interactions. Importantly, this is the first large-scale study to evaluate gene-level microbial abundance features for ICI response prediction across multiple cancer types by deep learning. Our findings demonstrate that incorporating biological prior knowledge into deep learning models can improve the discovery of microbial biomarkers that can be generalized across cancer types and treatment settings, offering a novel strategy for patient stratification in immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.