ArticleCardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports2026
Efficacy and safety of semaglutide injection in Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin: a phase 3, randomized, active-controlled trial (SIZE-DM study).
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of generic semaglutide compared with innovator Semaglutide in Indian adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
methodsThis Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial enrolled 320 adults with T2DM inadequately controlled on metformin. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either generic semaglutide (Alkem laboratories Ltd.) or innovator Inj. semaglutide (Novo Nordisk) for 24 weeks in step-wise dose escalation from 0.25 mg/week to 2 mg/week. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. Secondary endpoints included changes in fasting and post-prandial glucose, body weight, and proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0%. Safety assessments included adverse events, hypoglycemia, various laboratory parameters.
resultsOf 320 participants randomized, 313 completed the study. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. At Week 24, both treatments achieved significant HbA1c reductions (mean - 2.20%), with generic semaglutide demonstrating non-inferiority to the reference. Reductions in body weight, fasting and post-prandial glucose were similar between arms. A total of 86.62% of participants achieved HbA1c < 7.0%. Safety profiles were comparable, with predominantly mild-to-moderate adverse events and no treatment-related serious adverse events.
conclusionGeneric semaglutide demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and comparable safety to innovator Semaglutide in Indian adults with T2DM inadequately controlled on metformin, offering an effective and accessible therapeutic option in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.