ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Feasibility of nonspinal bony landmark-based image registration in CyberKnife ® robotic radiotherapy for pelvic and femoral bone tumors.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastases using the CyberKnife system, spinal anatomy is generally employed as the alignment reference. However, when treating pelvic tumors such as those in the pubic bone or proximal femur, the spinal reference may be anatomically distant from the target, potentially compromising visualization and localization accuracy. This study evaluated the feasibility of using nonspinal bony landmarks, specifically the pubic bone and femoral neck, as reference points for image registration. Intrafractional positional deviations in six degrees of freedom and the frequency of intrafractional corrections were analyzed according to treatment site, including cases treated with conventional spine-based alignment. Alignment accuracy was visually and numerically verified by the treatment operator before beam delivery. Across all treatment sites, the mean translational and rotational deviations during treatment remained within ±0.5 mm and ± 0.5°, respectively. Furthermore, no substantial differences were observed in the mean frequency of intrafractional corrections among the different alignment approaches. These findings demonstrate that nonspinal tumor-adjacent bony landmarks can provide clinically acceptable accuracy comparable to conventional spine-based registration. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically assess the clinical feasibility of this approach in CyberKnife-based pelvic radiotherapy. The proposed method may serve as a practical and reliable alternative to spine-based alignment, particularly when the spine is remote from the target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.