ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Mind the gap: obtaining reliable sleep estimates and the diagnostic value of sleep discrepancy in individuals with Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Like Taking Part in Star Wars": Qualitative Study Using Thematic Analysis to Explore the Acceptability and Experiences of Older Adults Participating in Remote Longitudinal Sleep and Dementia Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Mind the gap: obtaining reliable sleep estimates and the diagnostic value of sleep discrepancy in individuals with Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionObjective sleep disturbances, including short and fragmented sleep, are observed in neurodegenerative diseases. However, subjective sleep disturbances are inconsistently reported. Improved understanding of objective and subjective sleep estimation is needed to tailor sleep interventions.
methodsBaseline subjective habitual sleep was compared to objective sleep measured by actigraphy averaged over 8 weeks in 20 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or Lewy body disease (LBD) and 20 healthy older adults. Discrepancies between objective and subjective sleep parameters were used to predict cohort membership (AD, LBD, or control).
resultsParticipants with AD and LBD estimated lower sleep disturbance than actigraphy. Subjective sleep quality was poorest in LBD and highest in AD. Subjective sleep and subjective-objective sleep discrepancy discriminated between cohorts with 80% accuracy. DISCUSSION: Subjective and objective sleep differ and both should be measured in MCI and dementia. Sleep discrepancy may have diagnostic utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.