ArticleBMC nursing2026
Factors influencing hand hygiene speak-up as perceived by nursing students with clinical practice experience: an application of the theory of planned behavior.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimHand hygiene is a cornerstone of infection prevention, and speaking up about hand hygiene non-compliance is increasingly emphasized as a key patient safety behavior. Although nursing students are future healthcare professionals, evidence regarding their hand hygiene speak-up behavior remains limited. This study aimed to identify factors influencing hand hygiene speak-up likelihood among nursing students during clinical practice based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional design was used. Participants were nursing students with clinical practice experience. Data were collected using validated instruments measuring the clinical learning environment, hand hygiene perception, patient safety culture, hand hygiene speak-up climate, and hand hygiene speak-up. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analysis.
resultsHand hygiene speak-up likelihood showed significant positive correlations with the clinical learning environment (r = 0.276, p < 0.001), hand hygiene perception (r = 0.203, p = 0.012), patient safety culture (r = 0.261, p = 0.001), and the hand hygiene speak-up climate (r = 0.346, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the hand hygiene speak-up climate (β = 0.242, p = 0.035) and the duration of hand hygiene education (β = 0.185, p = 0.021) were significant predictors of hand hygiene speak-up likelihood, jointly explaining 13.1% of the variance. In this study, hand hygiene speak-up was operationalised as the likelihood of speaking up in hypothetical hand hygiene non-compliance scenarios, rather than observed or self-reported actual speaking-up behaviour in clinical practice. Although statistically significant relationships were identified, the correlations among the variables were generally weak and the regression model explained a relatively small proportion of variance in hand hygiene speak-up behavior. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution.
conclusionThe findings of this study indicate that nursing students’ hand hygiene speak-up likelihood is significantly associated with the clinical learning environment, hand hygiene perception, patient safety culture, and the hand hygiene speak-up climate, with the speak-up climate and the duration of hand hygiene education emerging as key influencing factors. These results suggest that hand hygiene speak-up among nursing students represents a multidimensional behavioural intention, shaped not only by individual perceptions but also by educational exposure and the organisational context of clinical training. Accordingly, fostering a psychologically safe clinical learning environment and providing repeated, simulation-based hand hygiene education that reflects real clinical situations are essential for strengthening nursing students’ willingness and confidence to speak up for patient safety. However, because hand hygiene speak-up in this study reflects an intentional propensity rather than actual behaviour, the findings should be interpreted as foundational evidence for educational and environmental strategies to promote speaking up, rather than as direct indicators of speaking-up performance in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.