ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Functional movement quality, dynamic balance and injury prevalence in adolescent soccer players: comparison with sedentary adolescents.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional movement quality and dynamic balance are key components that play an important role in relation to injury prevalence in adolescent athletes. Rapid growth and neuromuscular changes during mid-adolescence can increase susceptibility to movement deficiencies and sports-related injuries. Comparing physically active and sedentary adolescents within the same methodological framework may contribute to a better understanding of modifiable injury prevalence factors.
methodsA total of 184 adolescents aged 14–16 years were included in the study (48 male soccer players, 45 female soccer players, 48 sedentary males, and 43 sedentary females). Functional movement quality was assessed using Functional Movement Analysis (FMS), and dynamic balance was assessed using the Y-Balance Test. Agility, flexibility, and coordination tests were applied to assess biomotor capacities. The differences between the functional movement quality, dynamic balance, and biomotor performance variables of the research group were examined using one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons. The effects of activity level (soccer player/sedentary), gender (male/female), and biological maturity offset (MO) factors on motor performance variables were analysed using 2 × 2 factorial ANCOVA. The relationships between the groups’ FMS, Y-Balance scores, and biomotor performance capacities were examined using Pearson correlation analysis.
resultsSoccer player groups exhibited significantly higher FMS scores (p < 0.05), Y-Balance composite scores (p < 0.001), and agility performance (p < 0.001) compared to sedentary participants. Activity level emerged as the primary determinant for all motor performance variables (p < 0.001), while the effect of gender was more limited. Significant correlations were found between FMS and Y-Balance test scores and agility and coordination performances (ranging from r = − 0.375 to r = 0.385, p < 0.01). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of self-reported injury prevalence (p > 0.05).
conclusionRegular soccer training was found to positively affect the functional movement quality, dynamic balance, and agility performance of adolescents. The results suggested that FMS and Y-Balance Tests were more suitable tools for identifying individual movement deficiencies and planning targeted training programs in this age group, rather than solely predicting future injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.