ArticleBMC medical education2026
Understanding undergraduate nursing students' learning journeys with artificial intelligence: a journey mapping study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in healthcare, nursing education faces growing expectations to prepare students with AI literacy. However, nursing students often encounter cognitive, emotional, and practical challenges when learning AI, and their learning experiences across the educational trajectory remain insufficiently understood. This study employed journey mapping to explore how undergraduate nursing students experience learning AI over time.
methodsA qualitative descriptive design was used. Seventeen undergraduate nursing students from four universities in different regions were purposively recruited between March and September 2025. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using content analysis. A journey map was developed to integrate students’ learning tasks, emotional trajectories, barriers, and needs across different stages of AI learning.
resultsThe AI learning journey was characterized by four stages: Initial Contact and Curiosity, Learning and Confusion, Integration and Anxiety, and Internalization and Confidence. Across these stages, students experienced distinct and evolving challenges. Early learning was characterized by limited relevance and fragmented exposure to AI concepts. Subsequent stages involved cognitive overload, theory–practice gaps, ethical uncertainty, and career-related anxiety, while later stages highlighted the need for feedback, institutional support, and opportunities for innovation and professional identity consolidation.
conclusionsJourney mapping revealed the dynamic and stage-specific nature of nursing students’ AI learning experiences. These findings highlight the importance of stage-sensitive educational approaches that combine early cognitive guidance, scaffolded technical learning, ethical reflection, and innovation-oriented support to strengthen AI education in undergraduate nursing programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.