ArticleBMC surgery2026
Adaptation of emergency surgical care during successive COVID-19 waves: a single-center analysis of surgically treated acute appendicitis.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies - including our own - demonstrated a significant decrease in emergency surgical presentations, including acute appendicitis (AA). While these early findings are well documented, little is known about how presentation patterns and clinical outcomes evolved across subsequent pandemic waves. This study examines longer-term trends in AA care across three distinct pandemic phases, highlighting how healthcare systems and patient responses adapted over time within a tertiary surgical setting.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study. Patients undergoing appendectomy between March 2020 and December 2021 were assigned to distinct pandemic phases based on national SARS-CoV-2 incidence (wave 2, wave 3, and wave 4). These were each compared separately to a pre-pandemic reference cohort treated between January 2019 and February 2020. Demographic data, clinical presentation, laboratory values, histological findings, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.
resultsThroughout the pandemic period, the number of appendectomies remained lower than in the pre-pandemic reference group, particularly during high-incidence phases. Patients in wave 2 presented with more advanced disease, including significantly higher rates of perforation and peritonitis. In waves 3 and 4, disease severity and postoperative outcomes were comparable to the pre-pandemic reference period.
conclusionThis long-term analysis suggests that the initial shift toward more advanced disease among patients undergoing appendectomy was not sustained, with presentation patterns and outcomes tending toward pre-pandemic levels during later pandemic waves. These findings may reflect adaptive processes within the healthcare system, despite ongoing external stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.