ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
A finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of tri-cortical versus traditional pedicle screw fixation in adult thoracic spine.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the biomechanical stability of tri-cortical pedicle screw fixation in adult thoracic vertebra using finite element analysis and to compare its performance with traditional fixation methods.
methodsA three-dimensional finite element model of T5-11 thoracic vertebrae was established based on CT data from a healthy adult volunteer. Four different fixation groups were designed: Group A (Short-segment pedicle screw fixation from T7 to T10), Group B (Long-segment pedicle screw fixation from T6 to T10), Group C (Short-segment pedicle screw fixation with a tri-cortical pedicle screw at T7), and Group D (Short-segment pedicle screw fixation with two tri-cortical pedicle screws at T7 and T8). Biomechanical analysis was performed under six physiological loading conditions (flexion, extension, left/right rotation, left/right lateral bending) with 8 Nm moment and 400 N axial preload.
resultsGroups C and D with tri-cortical pedicle screw fixation demonstrated numerically lower displacement compared to traditional fixation groups (A and B) under all loading conditions. The displacement in Group C decreased by 11.11%-31.47% and in Group D by 12.96%-32.34% compared to Group A across all loading conditions. Group D showed slightly better performance than Group C in displacement. Stress analysis revealed substantial reductions in adjacent segment stress (annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, and cartilage endplate) in tri-cortical groups, with decreases ranging from 59.25% to 95.46% compared to Group A. Minimal difference was observed in internal fixation stress between groups.
conclusionTri-cortical pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in thoracic vertebra compared to traditional fixation methods, with numerically lower adjacent segment stress, suggesting potential benefits for reducing the biomechanical risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in clinical applications. This study provides biomechanical evidence supporting the use of tri-cortical pedicle screw fixation as a novel strategy for reducing the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.