ArticleRespiratory research2026
Diagnostic yield and safety of needle-based COnfocaL LAser endomicroscopy and ultrasound-guided pleural BiOpsy in diagnosing patients with unknown pleuRAl effusion: a protocol for a mulTIcenter, randomized cONtrolled trial (COLLABORATION-II).
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07040241 (Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Probe-based COnfocaL LAser Endomicroscopy and Ultrasound-guided Pleural BiOpsy in Diagnosing Patients With Unknown pleuRAl Effusion), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Probe-based COnfocaL LAser Endomicroscopy and Ultrasound-guided Pleural BiOpsy in Diagnosing Patients With Unknown pleuRAl Effusion: a Protocol of a Multicenter, Randomized cONtrolled Trial (COLLABORATION-Ⅱ）
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion is challenging. Although ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy (UGBx) is common, its effectiveness varies, especially in the absence of pleural abnormalities. New imaging techniques have been explored to improve UGBx outcomes, but the results remain inadequate. Recently, needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) has been used to improve biopsy targeting and diagnostic yield through real-time cellular-level imaging; however, robust evidence is lacking. This trial aims to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of nCLE-assisted UGBx for unknown exudative pleural effusions.
methodsCOLLABORATION-II is a multicenter randomized controlled study in China involving 324 participants across ten centers. Participants will be divided into two groups based on the ultrasound findings: Group 1 with pleural thickening (> 5 mm) and/or pleural nodularity, and Group 2 with thickness ≤ 5 mm and no nodularity. Each group will be randomly assigned to either the nCLE-assisted UGBx or UGBx arm at a 1:1 ratio, with a 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome is the overall diagnostic yield, while secondary outcomes include the biopsy success rate, diagnostic sensitivity for specific diseases, complication in incidence, and specimen characteristics, such as size, quality, interpretability, and adequacy for achieving molecular diagnosis. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that the nCLE-assisted UGBx will achieve higher diagnostic yield than conventional UGBx by providing real-time, cellular-level visualization and targeted sampling of pathological areas. If this hypothesis is validated, nCLE-assisted UGBx could emerge as a novel and effective option for diagnosing patients with unknown exudative pleural effusion.
trial registrationThis study has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Registration number: NCT07040241; Registration Date: 2025-06-26).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.