Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026595›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Evaluation of midline lingual canal using Doppler ultrasonography and CBCT: a pilot study.

Nagihan Koç, Sema Dural

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nagihan KoçDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 06230, Turkey. nagihan.koc@hacettepe.edu.tr.
Sema DuralDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 06230, Turkey.

Funding

Hacettepe University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit TAY-2022-20121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main arterial supply to the anterior segment of the mandible consists of a single terminal branch from the anastomosis of the left and right sublingual arteries that enter the lingual foramen and courses through the midline lingual canal (MLC). The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between the diameter of the MLC by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and quantitative measurements of the anastomotic arterial branch as obtained by Doppler ultrasonography (USG).

methodsA total of 24 patients (mean age, 48.4 years; range, 20–73 years) with CBCT scans were included in the study. The diameter of MLC was measured on the axial CBCT sections. The volumetric flow rate and the diameter of the artery were assessed using Doppler USG. Statistical analyses were conducted using Student’s t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r).

resultsThe diameter of the MLC ranged from 0.44 to 1.52 mm. The diameter and the volumetric flow rate of the artery were 1.1–1.9 mm and 1.3–16.9 ml/min, respectively. The MLC diameter was positively correlated with both arterial diameter (r = 0.404, P = 0.05) and arterial blood-flow rate (r = 0.447, P = 0.028).

conclusionsDoppler USG is a safe and effective method for visualizing and measuring the anastomotic arterial branch in the lingual foramen region. The diameter of the MLC on CBCT may indicate the vascularity of the interforaminal region of the mandible.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMandibleTongueUltrasonography, DopplerAdultAgedArteriesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsYoung AdultCone-beam computed tomographyDopplerLingual foramenSublingual arteryUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42026595
PMCPMC13273949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.