ArticleBMC medical education2026
Current levels and needs of digital competence among medical teachers in Uzbekistan: a multi-institutional assessment and future directions.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital competence is essential for effective teaching in medical education, supporting technology integration and learner engagement. In low-resource contexts systematic evaluation of educators’ digital competence remains limited. This study assessed the digital competence of medical teachers in Uzbekistan and identified professional development priorities using the European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu) and Importance–Performance Analysis (IPA).
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted across four public medical institutes in Uzbekistan. Of 291 submissions, 266 valid responses were analysed. The questionnaire included demographic information and 22 DigCompEdu indicators across six competence areas. Participants rated perceived importance and self-reported performance on a five-point Likert scale. Based on performance scores, respondents were classified into DigCompEdu proficiency levels. IPA was used to examine gaps between importance and performance and to categorise competencies into four quadrants.
resultsOverall, 66.9% of respondents were classified as “leaders” or “pioneers,” indicating high self-rated digital competence. Common strengths across proficiency groups included reflective practice, selecting digital resources, teaching with technology, learner engagement, and information and media literacy. Lower-rated areas included continuous professional development, creating and adapting digital resources, collaborative and personalised learning, digital communication, and responsible digital use. IPA revealed that less proficient teachers prioritised professional development and resource management, while intermediate groups emphasised supporting students’ self-regulated learning and problem solving. Among highly proficient teachers, creating and modifying digital resources and supporting learners’ digital content creation remained comparatively weaker areas.
conclusionsMedical teachers in Uzbekistan reported generally strong digital competence; however, gaps persist in competencies required for progression toward transformative digital pedagogy. Targeted professional development should prioritise digital resource creation, learner content creation, adaptive teaching practices, responsible digital use, and sustained opportunities for continuous professional development to enhance teaching quality in technology-mediated clinical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.