Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026537›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Image analysis for cervical cancer classification using deep learning techniques.

Emmanuel Christian Nyabyenda, Kizito Nkurikiyeyezu, Muzungu Hirwa Sylvain, Gashaija Absolomon, Isaac Komezusenge, Fauste Ndikumana, Melissa Uwase, Jean Damascene Hagenimana, Piero Mazimpaka Irakiza, Felix K Rubuga and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emmanuel Christian NyabyendaCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition, (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda. nechristian01@gmail.com.
Kizito NkurikiyeyezuAfrican Centre of Excellence in Biomedical Engineering and e-Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Muzungu Hirwa SylvainUniversity of Rwanda, African Centre of Excellence in Data Science, Kigali, Rwanda.
Gashaija AbsolomonCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition, (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.
Isaac KomezusengeUniversity of Rwanda, African Centre of Excellence in Data Science, Kigali, Rwanda.
Fauste NdikumanaUniversity of Rwanda, African Centre of Excellence in Data Science, Kigali, Rwanda.
Melissa UwaseSchool of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean Damascene HagenimanaCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition, (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.
Piero Mazimpaka IrakizaCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition, (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.
Felix K RubugaCentre for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building for Health Information Systems and Nutrition, (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.
Dieudonne KayirangaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Belson RugwizangogaUniversity Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK), Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

National Institute of Health (NIH) #s U2RTW012122 and UE5 HL172181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related molarity among women in sub-Sahara Africa, where limited pathology capacity constrains timely diagnosis. Rwanda reports one of the highest cervical cancers incidence rates in the region, and there is a pressing need for scalable decision-support tools to augment histopathology services. This study evaluated deep learning models for automated binary classification of cervical histopathology images from a tertiary hospital in Kigali, Rwanda.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-center study using 885 hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained cervical biopsy image patches acquired at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK) between 2018 and 2024. Regions of interest were annotated by board-certified pathologists and organized into normal versus abnormal (precancerous and malignant) categories. Three ImageNet-pretrained convolutional neural networks (ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, DenseNet121) were fine-tuned using patient-level, stratified splits (70% training, 20% validation, 10% test), class-weighted loss, and domain consistent data augmentation. Performance was assessed on the held-out test set using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC), Brier score, and calibration curves with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsEfficientNetB0 achieved the best overall performance, with test accuracy 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00), sensitivity 0.98, specificity 1.00, F1-score 0.99, ROC-AUC 0.99, and the lowest Brier score (0.02). ResNet50 reached an accuracy of 0.91 (ROC-AUC 0.96), while DenseNet121 obtained an accuracy of 0.86 (ROC-AUC 0.96), with comparatively poorer calibration. EfficientNetB0 misclassified only one abnormal image as normal and produced no false positives on the test set.

conclusionsCompact deep learning architectures, particularly EfficientNetB0, can deliver near-perfect discrimination between normal and abnormal cervical histopathology in a resource constrained Rwandan setting. These results support the feasibility of AI-assisted pathology as a triage tool but require external, multi-center and prospective validation before clinical deployment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUterine Cervical NeoplasmsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesROC CurveRwandaBinary classificationClass imbalanceHistopathological imagesMedical image analysisMulti-class classification

Identifiers

PMID42026537
PMCPMC13245104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.