SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Dental arch dimension and palatal morphology in children and adolescents with mouth breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMouth breathing (MB) may negatively affect facial and dental morphology in children, potentially causing malocclusion and other abnormalities. However, its effects, such as narrowing of the dental arches and a higher palatal vault, remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate dental arch and palatal morphology in MB children, vital for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
methodsA search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and Scopus for studies published until December 2025. The review included clinical trials and observational studies comparing dental dimensions in MB and normal breathing (NB) children under 18, using plaster or 3D dental casts. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, with data analysed using Revman software.
resultsOf 7,995 studies identified, 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated a significant reduction in upper intercanine width (UICW; p = 0.02) and intermolar widths (UIMW; p = 0.01, LIMW; p = 0.02) in MB children. However, the lower ICW (p = 0.54), palatal width (at canines; p = 0.09, at primary second molars; p = 0.36, at permanent first molars; p = 0.13) and palatal depth at canines (p = 0.82) and first premolars (p = 0.13) were comparable between both groups. Palatal depth at second premolar and molar positions (p = 0.0001, p = 0.04, respectively) and posterior crossbite frequency (p < 0.00001) were higher in MB group.
conclusionsMB children exhibit narrower upper arches at canines and molars, with decreased width only at molars in the lower arch. Furthermore, MB children tend to exhibit deeper palate in the posterior region, and there is an increased prevalence of posterior crossbite among them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.