ArticleBMC public health2026
Frontline clinicians' perceptions of the stigmatization of covid-19 and suggestions to prevent future health-related stigma: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost studies examining COVID-19 related stigma in the healthcare setting have focused either on the patient’s or clinicians’ own experiences of being stigmatized. Few studies have explored frontline clinicians’ perceptions about the stigmatization of COVID-19 and stigma prevention. This study aimed to better understand, through the perceptions of physicians, nurses and other frontline healthcare providers, the drivers that underlie the stigmatization of COVID-19, and strategies to prevent future health-related stigma.
methodsIndividual interviews were conducted with 19 clinicians from the states of Washington, Illinois, New York and Florida. Interview questions included perceptions about stigma related to COVID-19, drivers of stigma, and recommendations for stigma prevention. All authors participated in thematic analysis of the interviews through an iterative process of comparison, dialogue, and consensus.
resultsMajor themes that emerged were (1) the changing nature of COVID-19 stigma over time, (2) evidence of stigma towards patients, (3) evidence of stigma towards and between providers, (4) stigma related to vaccination, (5) underlying drivers of COVID-19 stigma, and (6) how to reduce and prevent stigmatization. Drivers of stigma included existing biases, fear of infection, blame, burnout, and the way information was messaged. Suggestions for methods to prevent stigma toward COVID-19 patients and providers included humanizing patients, showing mutual respect for different ways of thinking, facilitating community cohesion, and messaging from health leaders and media to patients, providers and the public.
conclusionsOur findings provide novel, frontline observational information that can inform policy decisions and interventions to mitigate current health-related stigma and prevent future health-related stigmatization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.