Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026506›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

"The success is just seeing them connected" - a mixed methods analysis of group-based perinatal education in eight state prisons.

Karenna Thomas, Anne Siegler, Rebecca Freese, Chelsey Bull, Rebecca J Shlafer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karenna ThomasDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. thom8698@umn.edu.
Anne SieglerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Rebecca FreeseClinical and Translational Science Institute Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Chelsey BullCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Rebecca J ShlaferDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Pregnancy and Postpartum Support Programs for Women in Prison: Maternal and Neonatal OutcomesR01HD103634 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SHLAFER, REBECCA J. · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 5R01HD103634NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD103634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOf the 91,100 women incarcerated in the United States, the vast majority are within childbearing age and between 0.5% and 4% are pregnant at intake. Pregnant and postpartum individuals face significant gaps in access to healthcare and support systems inside. Group perinatal education offers one way to supplement existing clinical care and improve physical and mental health outcomes; however, existing research exploring the structure, curricula, and potential benefits of such programming is limited.

methodsThree sources of data were collected between 2021 and 2025. Group logs were completed at weekly meetings, individual client satisfaction data was obtained from surveys conducted after birth, and interviews were conducted with subject matter experts from the eight participating states. Group topics and satisfaction were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative interviews were thematically analyzed for perceived benefits.

resultsAll sites offered group education and the majority of sessions covered both prenatal and postpartum content. Common topics included coping with incarceration, parenting, and emotional changes during the perinatal period. Group participants reported high levels of satisfaction with both education and peer support. Professionals described a strong sense of community, knowledge-sharing, and increased self-advocacy among group participants.

conclusionsIncarcerated birthing people experience multiple forms of marginalization and face unique challenges during the perinatal period, exacerbated by limited access to quality and timely healthcare, mental health resources, and social support outside of prison. Prenatal and postpartum groups fill a critical gap by providing individuals with social, emotional, and informational support.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicPerinatal CarePrisonersPrisonsAdultFemaleHealth Services for PrisonersHumansPatient SatisfactionPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchSocial SupportUnited StatesChildbirth educationIncarcerationMaternal and child healthPeer supportPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42026506
PMCPMC13237915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.