Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2026
Aspartate aminotransferase-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is a rapidly progressive tick-borne viral disease with substantial mortality. Yet early risk stratification still lacks a simple and practical biomarker. We assessed the prognostic value of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-lymphocyte ratio index (ALRI) for in-hospital mortality in SFTS and examined whether early dynamic reassessment could further refine risk stratification.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective study of consecutive hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed SFTS at Yantai Qishan Hospital and Beijing Ditan Hospital between June 2022 and June 2025. Baseline ALRI was calculated as aspartate aminotransferase divided by lymphocyte count. Its prognostic performance was compared with conventional laboratory markers and viral load using receiver operating characteristic analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression, phenotype stratification, and correlation analyses. Dynamic ALRI changes from admission to Day 7 were also assessed, and a Day 0-Day 3 two-step rule was evaluated in a Day 3 landmark cohort.
resultsAmong 220 patients, 51 died and 169 survived during hospitalization. Baseline ALRI was significantly higher in non-survivors and showed moderate discriminatory performance among the evaluated biomarkers for in-hospital mortality, with an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.72–0.85). At the optimal cutoff of 590.63, sensitivity was 78.43% and specificity was 73.37%. High baseline ALRI was associated with markedly worse survival (hazard ratio 6.91, 95% confidence interval 3.54–13.47; P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, ALRI remained independently associated with mortality, including after adjustment for viral load. Higher ALRI was also linked to a more severe clinical profile, including greater intensive care use, higher viral load and organ injury markers, and lower lymphocyte and platelet counts. ALRI remained consistently higher in non-survivors during follow-up. Dynamic ALRI changes from admission to Day 7 were assessed when available, and the Day 0–Day 3 two-step rule was evaluated in a Day 3 landmark cohort of 214 patients. In the Day 3 landmark cohort, persistently high ALRI from Day 0 to Day 3 identified patients at particularly high risk of death.
conclusionsALRI may be useful for early risk stratification in hospitalized patients with SFTS. In addition to admission assessment, reassessment around Day 3 may help identify a persistently high-risk subgroup, particularly those with sustained ALRI elevation from Day 0 to Day 3. Prospective external validation is still needed before routine clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.