ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Analysis of mental health outcomes in major versus minor upper extremity amputations: a retrospective national database study.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpper extremity amputations are associated with developing psychiatric conditions. The aim of this study is to identify differences in mental health outcomes for patients undergoing major versus minor upper extremity amputations.
methodsData were obtained from the PearlDiver database between 2010 and 2022 using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients aged 10 and above without prior mental health diagnoses or antidepressant prescription records who underwent upper extremity amputations were stratified by major (shoulder disarticulation, arm, forearm, wrist, transmetacarpal) versus minor (single metacarpal, digit, phalanx) amputations. Demographic characteristics and rates of mental health diagnoses, antidepressant prescriptions, and psychotherapy care were assessed for 90 days and one year postoperatively, using Welch's T-tests and Pearson's chi-squared tests.
resultsPatients with major amputations had increased risk of mental health diagnoses at 90 days (OR: 3.29, p < 0.001) and at one year (OR: 2.01, p < 0.001). Both groups had higher rates of mental health diagnoses than the general population. Patients undergoing major amputations had higher odds of starting antidepressants at 90 days (OR 3.82, p < 0.001) and at one year (OR 2.38, p < 0.001). Psychotherapy care was significantly increased after major amputations at 90 days (OR 5.47, p < 0.001) and at one year (OR 4.18, p < 0.001).
conclusionsMental health disorders, antidepressant use, and psychotherapy care are significantly higher for major upper extremity amputations compared to minor amputations. Surgical teams should provide mental health resources to mitigate negative effects from mental health needs after upper extremity amputation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.