ArticleMikrochimica acta2026
MoS
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xylene, a representative volatile organic compound (VOC), poses significant risks to both human health and the environment, making its reliable detection essential. In this study, a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensor was designed and evaluated for xylene determination using individual molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and MXene films, as well as their bilayer configurations, operating at ambient temperature. The typical responses of all fabricated sensors were initially compared at 600 ppm xylene and 30% RH. Among the tested configurations, the MoS2/MXene bilayer demonstrated the most favorable sensing performance. The optimized bilayer was further evaluated across a broader concentration range (2.5–600 ppm) and varying relative humidity levels (30–99% RH) using frequency-shift measurements, achieving a detection limit of 1.23 ppm and a sensitivity of 2.46 Hz/ppm, along with enhanced selectivity. The improved response is attributed to the synergistic integration of MoS2—characterized by a high specific surface area and structural vacancies—with MXene, which provides high conductivity and a porous structure containing vacancy-induced active sites. Their coupling enables interfacial electron transfer from MXene to MoS2, likely through the formation of a Schottky-type heterojunction, which can subtly modulate surface interactions. This coupling also increases the density of vacancies and active adsorption sites, leading to enhanced sensor performance. Humidity-dependent measurements reveal a moderate reduction in sensing response with increasing relative humidity, consistent with the experimentally observed baseline drift and competitive adsorption effects. These results highlight the importance of humidity stabilization or compensation for reliable sensing under real conditions. Overall, the MoS2/MXene bilayer sensor offers a robust and selective platform for real-time xylene monitoring under ambient conditions, provided that humidity effects are properly managed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42026381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.