ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Factors Influencing Participation in Precision Health Research Among Diverse Individuals in South Carolina.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrecision health research uses genomic, environmental, and lifestyle data to tailor disease prevention, health promotion, and treatment strategies. While it offers potential for improved diagnoses and personalized care, recruitment and retention remain challenging.
methodsThe Precision rEsearCh pArticipatioN (PECAN) study used an exploratory qualitative design, guided by the socioecological model, to examine barriers and facilitators to participation in precision health research among diverse South Carolina residents. Ten focus groups were conducted with 23 participants, exploring individual, interpersonal, and community-level influences.
resultsBarriers included mistrust in the medical system, limited awareness of research opportunities, and logistical issues such as transportation and scheduling. Facilitators included perceived health benefits, monetary incentives, ease of participation, and strong communication with the research team. Recommendations to address barriers included inclusive outreach, transparent communication about data use and participant expectations, leveraging provider relationships, and offering flexible scheduling and locations.
conclusionThe PECAN study highlights how mistrust, logistical barriers, and historical inequities-such as medical exploitation and limited rural research infrastructure-impede participation in precision health research. Facilitators like health benefits and effective communication can support engagement. Despite a small sample size, findings underscore the need for systemic change, including policy-level solutions to expand rural research infrastructure, enhance provider engagement, and ensure transparent data practices. These insights from rural and diverse communities emphasize the urgency of structural changes to promote equitable participation in precision health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.