ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Contextual cueing and attention control: Self-face vs. stranger-face search.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contextual cueing effect demonstrates that visual search is faster when targets appear in repeated, rather than nonrepeated, spatial configurations-a phenomenon attributed to learned attentional guidance. This study investigated how attention, modulated by social salience of face stimuli, influences such implicit spatial learning. Using self-face and stranger-face images as search items, participants located a unique-identity target among distractors of another identity. The face identity condition was implemented using a between-subjects design in Experiment 1 and a within-subjects design in Experiment 2. Results revealed a critical dissociation: Reliable contextual cueing emerged when participants searched for a self-face target among stranger-face distractors. Conversely, this learning effect was consistently attenuated or absent when self-faces served as distractors during searches for a stranger target. We propose that self-face distractors function as an "attentional magnet." They not only capture attention effectively but also disrupt the global processing required to encode the spatial layout of a scene. This impairs the formation of stable context-target associations, without necessarily slowing overall search speed. Our findings underscore an asymmetric influence of self-relevance and highlight how social salience can selectively disrupt implicit spatial learning when salient stimuli are task irrelevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42026357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.