Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026333›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Deep learning for synthetic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI: a scoping review.

Gyu-Dong Jo, Yoon Joo Choi, Chena Lee, Kug Jin Jeon, Sang-Sun Han

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gyu-Dong JoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Joo ChoiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chena LeeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kug Jin JeonDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Sun HanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. SSHAN@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1775-7862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeep learning-based synthetic contrast imaging has been proposed as an alternative to iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents in CT and MRI. This scoping review aimed to provide a cross-modality overview of current evidence, including study characteristics and validation strategies. MATERIALS AND

methodsFollowing PRISMA-ScR guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to September 2025. Eligible studies applied deep learning to synthesize contrast-enhanced CT/MRI from non-contrast or modified-contrast inputs and reported reference-based validation. Extracted variables included modality, anatomy, input type, model type, dataset scale, validation category, and four predefined evaluation metrics.

resultsFifty-six studies met the inclusion criteria (25 CT, 31 MRI). The brain was the most frequent target, followed by head and neck, breast, and liver applications. Non-contrast inputs were used in 71% of studies, with the remainder using modified-contrast strategies. Generative adversarial networks were the predominant model class, while diffusion and transformer models appeared after 2023. Dataset sizes ranged from 10 to 7306 (median, 218), and 57% of studies were single-center. Quantitative fidelity was evaluated in 88% of studies, reporting structural similarity index values of 0.73-0.99 and peak signal-to-noise ratios of 22-51 dB. Task-based performance was assessed in 39% of studies, radiologist-rated image quality in 54%, and diagnostic performance in 30%, with sensitivities of 72-92% and specificities of 59-95%.

conclusionDeep learning-based synthetic contrast imaging shows high quantitative and perceptual fidelity, but evidence supporting diagnostic interchangeability and routine clinical use remains limited. KEY POINTS: Question Reducing contrast media use in CT and MRI is a clinical priority, and deep learning-based synthetic imaging is emerging as a potential alternative. Findings Deep learning generated synthetic contrast-enhanced images with high quantitative fidelity and acceptable image quality, but diagnostic performance was evaluated in only limited studies. Clinical relevance This review outlines the capabilities and limitations of deep learning-based synthetic contrast imaging, informing the development of contrast-minimizing strategies for safer CT and MRI practice.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedGenerative Adversarial NetworksHumansContrast MediaContrast mediaDeep learningImage enhancementMagnetic resonance imagingTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.