Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026283›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Surgical Approaches and Complications in OSIA: a Systematic Review.

Moayyad Malas, Amal Alghtani, Ibrahim Alabdulkarim, Alhussain Kullab, Abdulrahman Hagr, Fida Almuhawas

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moayyad MalasDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Moayyadwm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-7786
Amal AlghtaniCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim AlabdulkarimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alhussain KullabCochlear, Cochlear Arabia Regional Headquarters, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman HagrDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fida AlmuhawasDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

cochlear arabia headquareter cochlear arabia headquareter
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Osseointegrated Steady-State Implant (OSIA) is an active transcutaneous bone conduction system offering effective hearing rehabilitation via a piezoelectric actuator and osseointegrated anchor, while preserving skin integrity. Despite the growing adoption of OSIA, the literature on optimal surgical approaches and complication patterns remains fragmented.

objectiveThis is the first systematic review aimed at evaluating intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with OSIA implantation, with a specific focus on incision orientation, patient age, and prior surgical history.

methodsA systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for studies published from January 2016 to April 2025. Fifteen eligible studies were included, encompassing 784 OSIA implants across prospective and retrospective cohorts.

resultsOSIA implantation was associated with a low pooled intraoperative complication rate of 0.77% and a postoperative complication rate of 5.25%. Most complications were mild and manageable, with no cases requiring permanent device removal. Incisions placed across the device had a significantly higher complication rate (14.4%) compared to incisions placed around the device (4.6%). Pediatric-predominant cohorts experienced more complications (10.2%) than adult-predominant cohorts (4.3%). Patients with prior mastoidectomy had a complication rate of 12.0%.

conclusionOSIA is a generally safe hearing solution, but surgical planning should consider patient-specific factors and incision orientation. Incisions placed across the device are linked to higher complication rates. These findings support evidence-based risk stratification and preoperative counseling.

Indexed as

Bone-Anchored ProsthesisHearing AidsHearing LossIntraoperative ComplicationsPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis ImplantationBone ConductionHumansOsseointegrationBone anchored hearing devicesHearing lossHearing restorationOSIA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.