Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026229›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

Sociodemographic characteristics of populations living near industrial land disposals of known and suspected carcinogens across the United States.

Elizabeth Sharp, Caroline N Pruitt, Jared A Fisher, Abigail R Flory, Barry I Graubard, Mary H Ward, Rena R Jones, Jessica M Madrigal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth SharpOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Caroline N PruittOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jared A FisherOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Abigail R FloryWestat, Inc, Rockville, MD, USA.
Barry I GraubardBiostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Mary H WardOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Rena R JonesOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jessica M MadrigalOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA. jessica.madrigal@nih.gov.

Funding

Cancer Risk and Environmental ExposuresZIACP010125 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PURDUE, MARK · 2009 to 2025
$41.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndustrial facilities dispose of millions of pounds of chemical waste in U.S.-based landfills, surface impoundments, and underground injection wells annually, but information on populations living in proximity to these releases is limited.

objectiveWe quantified on-site land disposals of known and suspected human carcinogens and evaluated population characteristics associated with disposals in the 50 U.S. states and Puerto Rico.

methodsWe linked land releases of known and suspected carcinogenic chemicals from regulatory data (2010-2018) to 2010 census tract data overall and by region. We estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations of population characteristics with land releases of arsenic, asbestos, benzene, beryllium, cadmium, formaldehyde, nickel, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), cobalt, lead, and styrene, comparing tracts with the highest releases ( > median or 4

resultsKnown carcinogens with releases mostly to land included arsenic, asbestos, beryllium, cadmium, formaldehyde, nickel, and PCBs. Probable carcinogens included acrylamide, acrolein, cobalt, and hydrazine. Land disposal amounts were highest in the West and South. The tract proportion of Black population was associated with 8-31% higher odds of the highest land disposals of lead, cadmium, and formaldehyde. Increases in Hispanic and Latino population were associated with 29-33% higher odds of a tract having the highest disposals of benzene, asbestos, PCBs, and styrene. Measures of lower socioeconomic status were associated with the highest disposals, including 16-72% higher odds of tracts having the highest disposals per 10% increase in the proportion of families experiencing poverty. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings highlight differences between populations living in areas with industrial land disposals compared to areas without them. As most studies of industrial pollution focus on air exposure, this study illustrates the need to consider land disposals as potential sources of environmental exposure to known and suspected carcinogens. IMPACT: This evaluation showed that millions of pounds of carcinogenic chemicals and metals from industrial sources are disposed of on land annually across the U.S. Over 70% of industrial releases of asbestos, formaldehyde, polychlorinated biphenyls, and metals like beryllium, cadmium, and nickel occur as on-site land disposals to landfills, surface impoundments, and underground wells, with most occurring in the Southern and Western U.S. The highest volume disposals of these chemicals and metals occurred in census tracts with higher proportions of population with lower levels of educational attainment and family income and higher levels of poverty and unemployment.

Indexed as

CarcinogensEnvironmental ExposureIndustrial WasteWaste Disposal FacilitiesArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBerylliumCadmiumEnvironmental MonitoringFormaldehydeHumansPolychlorinated BiphenylsPuerto RicoSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBerylliumCadmiumCarcinogensFormaldehydeIndustrial WastePolychlorinated BiphenylsAsbestosLandfillsLead, cadmiumPolychlorinated biphenyls

Identifiers

PMID42026229
PMCPMC13538043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.