Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026209›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2026

Commentary: moving towards improved awareness and diagnosis of pediatric sarcopenia.

Nadine-Stella Achenjang, Anantha Harijith

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadine-Stella AchenjangDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Anantha HarijithDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA. harijith@arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-3862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marcelo Flores-Opazo, et al., in the manuscript titled "Advancing toward the diagnosis of sarcopenia in the pediatric population", have brought to light the difficulties in diagnosing pediatric sarcopenia and have proposed muscle mass-strength-functionality triad in creating a comprehensive definition of pediatric sarcopenia. Good quality studies on pediatric sarcopenia are lacking due to paucity of age and sex specific normative data for skeletal muscle mass and strength, especially in young children and infants. To enable an accurate diagnosis of sarcopenia in children, systematic data on growth, neurocognitive developmental status, and factors affecting physiological growth and development in various pediatric age groups are urgently warranted. As an initial step, promotion of physical literacy accompanied by regular activity would promote improved muscle strength, leading to the acquisition of improved fundamental movement skills contributing to normal growth and development. Consensus is essential in methodological approaches for sarcopenia diagnosis, body composition and skeletal muscle mass measurements, and age-appropriate muscle function tests in children. Early detection and management of sarcopenia in children would help reduce the healthcare burden and improve outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID42026209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.