Trial reportLeukemia2026
ASC4OPT: asciminib treatment optimization study in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase previously treated with two or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Trial report in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04948333 (A Phase 3b, Multi-center, Open-label, Treatment Optimization Study of Oral Asciminib in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3b, Multi-center, Open-label, Treatment Optimization Study of Oral Asciminib in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Previously Treated With 2 or More Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ASC4OPT non-comparative phase 3b study (NCT04948333) evaluates asciminib once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study enrolled 169 patients not in major molecular response (MMR), with unsatisfactory response (intolerant, warning or failure) as defined by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2020 criteria. Patients intolerant to their most recent TKI and in MMR at baseline (n = 30) were also enrolled. The primary endpoint was the MMR rate at Week 48 for patients not in MMR at baseline. Results showed an overall MMR rate of 39.4% at Week 48 (40 mg BID, 43.4%; 80 mg QD, 35.4%) and 43.6% at Week 96 (40 mg BID, 45.8%; 80 mg QD, 41.5%) in patients not in MMR at baseline. Among 40 patients who had their asciminib dose escalated to 200 mg QD, 17.5% were in MMR at Week 96. Most patients in MMR at baseline remained in MMR at 48 and 96 weeks (93.3% and 86.7%, respectively). Safety for both dosing regimens was consistent with that of previous studies. Findings support asciminib as a potential standard of care for patients with CML-CP who have not responded optimally to prior TKI therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.