ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026
Health consequences of anabolic steroids: a sexual-medicine perspective.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonmedical anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS) use is increasingly encountered in sexual medicine practice, often presenting through sexual symptoms or fertility concerns rather than overt systemic illness. This review summarizes the major health consequences of AAS abuse with emphasis on sexual and reproductive sequelae and provides a pragmatic approach to evaluation and recovery after cessation. AAS exposure commonly suppresses the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis, leading to hypogonadism and hormonal imbalance that may manifest as reduced libido, erectile dysfunction, gynecomastia, and impaired spermatogenesis ranging from severe oligozoospermia to azoospermia. Recovery after discontinuation is heterogeneous: endocrine parameters frequently normalize earlier than semen parameters, and prolonged/high-dose exposure is associated with delayed or incomplete recovery in a clinically meaningful subset. Beyond sexual and reproductive harm, convergent observational evidence supports increased cardiovascular risk (remodeling, dysfunction, and adverse events), hepatic injury (particularly with 17α-alkylated agents), hematologic/prothrombotic changes, tendon pathology, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and dermatologic complications, with risk shaped by dose, duration, and polypharmacy. In the absence of robust randomized trials, management should prioritize AAS cessation and relapse prevention. Clinicians should actively screen for organ-specific sequelae and individualize follow-up based on symptom burden, hormonal status, fertility goals, and time since last exposure, with selective use of pharmacological induction of recovery when clinically appropriate.
Identifiers
42026176What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.