ArticleScientific reports2026
Rumen bacteria, feed utilization, and milk production of Damascus goats fed different levels of azolla meal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Dietary Inclusion of Corn and Peas Affects the Fecal Bacterial Diversity and Composition of Sarda Goats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Azolla could be a promising alternative feed as it is a rich source of nutrients and bioactive compounds that can modulate rumen microbiota and improve animal productivity. This study evaluated the effects of inclusion dietary Azolla (Azolla pinnata) as a partial replacement of concentrate feed mixture (CFM) on rumen bacteria, nutrient digestibility, and milk production in lactating Damascus goats. Thirty-two goats were assigned to four groups (n = 8): a control group (C), A10, A20, and A30 to receive 0, 10%, 20%, and 30% of Azolla as a replacement of CFM, respectively. Microbial diversity increased in Azolla-fed goats, with enrichment of phylum Firmicutes in Azolla-supplemented groups C=13.36%, A10= 31.09%, A20= 25.15%, and A30= 29.85%. Fiber-degrading bacterial genera such as Prevotella, Ruminococcus, and Christensenellaceae R-7 group. .Crude protein digestibility was declined in supplemented groups and was found in order 74.76>69.11>68.24>63.93 %. Total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) and the concentration of acetate, propionate, and butyrate were higher in supplemented groups (p < 0.01). Fat-corrected milk (FCM) was higher in A20 (1139 mL/head) compared to other groups (C=992, A10=1050, A30=888 mL/head and feed efficiency followed the same trend (p < 0.05). Azolla could replace 20% of CFM in goats’ diet, and it is a viable alternative feed resource, particularly under challenges associated with the availability of conventional concentrate mixtures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.