Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026083›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

DxDirector: an agentic large language model driving the full-process clinical diagnosis.

Shicheng Xu, Xin Huang, Zihao Wei, Liang Pang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shicheng Xu *State Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin Huang *Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zihao Wei *State Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liang PangState Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. pangliang@ict.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-8546
Huawei ShenState Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xueqi ChengState Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

Beijing Nova Program 20250484765National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 62276248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical diagnosis in the real world often begins with ambiguous patient complaints that require iterative reasoning and testing. While large language models (LLMs) increasingly assist with specific medical queries, they currently lack the ability to autonomously drive this entire diagnostic workflow, limiting their potential to significantly alleviate physician workload. Here we present DxDirector-7B, an agentic LLM designed to navigate the full diagnostic process through advanced slow thinking capabilities. Unlike existing assistants, our model autonomously determines optimal diagnostic strategies, requesting physician intervention only for necessary clinical operations. In evaluations spanning rare diseases and complex real-world cases, DxDirector-7B achieves superior diagnostic accuracy compared to state-of-the-art medical and general-purpose LLMs with significantly larger parameters. Crucially, it drastically reduces physician involvement while maintaining a robust safety and accountability framework for high-risk conditions. These results demonstrate a paradigm shift where AI effectively leads clinical reasoning, offering a scalable solution to enhance diagnostic efficiency and accessibility.

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansPhysiciansRare DiseasesWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID42026083
PMCPMC13315919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.