Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026055›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Predicting individual differences of fear and cognitive learning and extinction.

C A Gomes, D R Bach, A Razi, G Batsikadze, S Elsenbruch, H Engler, T M Ernst, M C Fellner, C Fraenz, E Genç and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

C A GomesDepartment of Neuropsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. carlos.assuncaodias@rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5604-4377
D R BachDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3717-2036
A RaziDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-9439
G BatsikadzeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0517-0119
S ElsenbruchDepartment of Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6528-2665
H EnglerCenter for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1990
T M ErnstDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2170-9241
M C FellnerDepartment of Neuropsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
C FraenzDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
E GençDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
A KlassDepartment of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
F LabrenzDepartment of Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7284-3451
S LissekDepartment of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
C J MerzDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-6595
D MetzenInstitute of Psychology, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
A NostadtDepartment of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5102-2144
R J PawlikDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
J E SchneiderDepartment of Neuropsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-2461
M TegenthoffDepartment of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
A ThiemeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-8601
O T WolfDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
O GüntürkünErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4173-5233
H H QuickErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
R KumstaGenetic Psychology Lab, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
D TimmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
T SpisakCenter for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2942-0821
N AxmacherDepartment of Neuropsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-6492

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DFG SFB 1280 "Extinction Learning" (Project Nr. 316803389)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to acquire new information and to modify previously learned knowledge are critical in an ever-changing world. However, the efficacy of learning is notably variable among individuals, with extinction learning being the epitome of such variability. Abundant studies have identified a core network of brain regions including the amygdala, hippocampus, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (PFC) and, more recently, the cerebellum, as key players in learning and extinction. Yet, the precise interactions within this network and their relationship to individual learning abilities and extinction have remained largely unexplored. In the present study, we examined how functional (FC), effective (EC), and structural (SC) connectivity patterns in the core learning network allow the prediction of individual differences in the efficacy of learning, extinction, and renewal. Analysing a large dataset of over 500 participants across a multitude of paradigms, our results revealed that FC predicted better acquisition, with a central role of ACC and hippocampus, whereas SC, involving ACC and amygdala, predicted higher levels of extinction learning. EC results suggested a predominantly inhibitory coupling among core learning network nodes, with paradigm-specific EC connectivity patterns predicting learning. Our predictions not only generalised between fear and cognitive predictive learning paradigms but were also successful in predicting learning from task-related FC and simulated data. Together, these results describe the multimodal neural determinants of learning, extinction, and renewal, and may inform individualised interventions for affective disorders based on neural connectivity patterns.

Indexed as

CognitionExtinction, PsychologicalFearIndividualityLearningAdultAmygdalaBrainBrain MappingFemaleGyrus CinguliHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID42026055
PMCPMC13109375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.