ArticleNature communications2026
Assessing the contribution of rare DNA states to cancer mutational signatures using sequence-specific conformational fingerprinting.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the contribution of rare DNA states to cancer mutational signatures using sequence-specific conformational fingerprinting.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rare and short-lived DNA conformations are proposed to be key drivers of mutagenesis, yet assessing their contribution to mutational signatures found in human cancers remains challenging. Here, we develop an approach that quantifies the sequence-dependent propensity to form a rare DNA conformation and compare the resulting fingerprint against cancer mutational signatures. Using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.