Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42025782›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2026

Allocation of Kidney Allografts From Donors With Kidney Donor Profile Index <35% and the Impact of Kidney Donor Profile Index Revisions on Access to Transplantation for Children.

Elizabeth M Sonnenberg, Sandra Amaral, Siqi Zhang, Jeremy Rubin, Matthew H Levine, Vishnu S Potluri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation Changes and Pediatric Recipients: Are We Making the Best Match?American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth M SonnenbergDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: elizabeth.sonnenberg@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Sandra AmaralDepartment of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Siqi ZhangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeremy RubinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Matthew H LevineDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Vishnu S PotluriRenal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Reaching Equity for Adults and CHildren in Transplant (REACH-TRANSPLANT)R01DK120886 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AMARAL, SANDRA, KU, ELAINE · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Determining Optimal Immunosuppression and Kidney Allocation Strategies for Mitigating Risks from Epstein-Barr Virus in Kidney Transplant CentersR01AI191110 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Vishnu Sagar Potluri · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
Impact of Geographic Boundaries on Deceased Donor Kidney Discard, Allocation, and OutcomesK08DK127250 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI POTLURI, VISHNU SAGAR · 2021 to 2025
$838k
Promoting Diversity and Sustainability in the NIDDK-Supported Research Workforce through Mentoring Early Career Investigators: Focus on Health EquityK26DK138377 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Sandra Amaral · 2023 to 2026
$478k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI191110NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK127250NIDDK NIH HHS K26 DK138377NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK120886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveChildren in the United States receive priority for kidneys with a kidney donor profile index (KDPI) < 35%, although their priority falls below that of certain adult recipients. Recently, the KDPI was revised to include 8 donor characteristics instead of 10. We sought to (1) describe the allocation of these high-quality kidneys and (2) compare the characteristics of donors with a KDPI < 35% using the original KDPI (KDPI-10) versus the revised KDPI (KDPI-8) calculation. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study. SETTING &

participants60,587 deceased donors and their kidney recipients in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. EXPOSURE: KDPI calculated using KDPI-10 and KDPI-8 (without race and hepatitis C virus [HCV]). OUTCOME: The primary outcome was the use of kidneys with a KDPI < 35% overall. Secondary outcome was the utilization of kidneys from "ideal pediatric-quality donors" who were defined as having a KDPI < 35%, diagnosed with brain death, were aged <35 years, had a creatinine level ≤ 1.5 mg/dL, and had no infectious risk, diabetes, or hypertension. Additionally, we assessed the changes in characteristics of KDPI < 35% donors after revision to the KDPI. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive statistics.

resultsDuring the study period, 23.4% of KDPI-10 < 35% and 34.3% of ideal pediatric-quality, KDPI-10 < 35% kidneys were transplanted into adults in allocation categories that receive more priority than children. Nearly three-quarters of these adults were multiorgan recipients. Compared with the KDPI-10 calculation, the donors with a KDPI < 35% using the KDPI-8 calculation were more often Black (15.3% vs 9.9%), HCV seropositive (11.1% vs 3.6%), and less frequently donated after circulatory death (12.7% vs 20.3%). The proportion of KDPI < 35% donors who are ideal pediatric-quality was similar (32.7% KDPI-10 vs 33.5% KDPI-8). LIMITATIONS: Extrapolation of KDPI-8 donor characteristics using a historical cohort.

conclusionsMany ideal pediatric-quality kidneys are allocated to adults, primarily multiorgan transplant recipients. We anticipate no meaningful change in the proportion of ideal pediatric-quality kidneys prioritized for children using the revised KDPI-8 calculation. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Children with end-stage kidney disease are intended to have priority for kidneys from the best-quality kidney donors. However, their priority may fall below adult candidates who need multiple organs or are highly sensitized. Only about one-third of donors prioritized for children are ideal pediatric quality, meaning they come from young donors with minimal risk of kidney dysfunction. About one-third of these top-quality kidneys are transplanted into adults with more priority than children, most often transplanted into recipients receiving more than 1 organ transplant. Recently, the risk index used to determine which kidneys are prioritized for children was revised by excluding donor race and donor infection with hepatitis C. Our study suggests this change will not substantially affect the proportion of ideal pediatric-quality kidneys offered to children.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionKidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAllograftsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesDeceased donor allocationKDPIKDRIpediatric kidney transplant

Identifiers

PMID42025782
PMCPMC13397131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.