Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42025769›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Synthetically trained convolutional neural networks for time-resolved aortic segmentation of four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging.

Gloria Wolkerstorfer, Pietro Dirix, Cosima Jahnke, Ingo Paetsch, Robert Manka, Stefano Buoso, Sebastian Kozerke

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gloria WolkerstorferInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: wolkerstorfer@biomed.ee.ethz.ch.
Pietro DirixInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cosima JahnkeDepartment of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ingo PaetschDepartment of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Robert MankaInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefano BuosoInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sebastian KozerkeInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupervised learning-based approaches are increasingly used for vessel segmentation in four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). However, their widespread adoption is challenged by the need for diverse, reliably annotated datasets, sensitivity to acquisition and reconstruction settings, and the lack of fully defined ground truth.

methodsIn this study, we investigated the use of realistic, fluid mechanics-informed synthetic 4D flow CMR data to train convolutional neural networks for time-resolved aortic segmentation. The availability of fully defined ground-truth vessel geometries in synthetic data enabled quantitative evaluation before evaluation on in vivo data acquired across three scanners with varying field strengths and protocols. Four training strategies were evaluated: one using in vivo data only (R-28) and three based on increasing amounts and diversity of synthetic data (S-28, S-multi, and S-full). Performance was assessed using voxel- and surface-based metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Bland-Altman analysis.

resultsThe S-full model achieved the best performance on the in vivo test dataset, with a DSC of 0.956 ± 0.017 and a HD of (1.7 ± 1.5) mm, relative to reference annotations. Bland-Altman analysis of cross-sectional areas showed small biases and narrow limits of agreement, with 1.1% [-10.9, 13.1]% for the ascending aorta and -1.0% [-13.1, 11.1]% for the descending aorta. For the in vivo trained model (R-28) evaluated on synthetic data, relative cross-sectional area measurements yielded biases of 3.1% [-10.9, 17.0]% in the ascending aorta and 4.0% [-8.2, 16.2]% in the descending aorta, relative to synthetic ground truth.

conclusionThis work demonstrates that purely synthetic 4D flow CMR can be used to train neural networks for time-resolved aortic segmentation of in vivo 4D flow CMR data, enabling fully automatic inference and quantitative evaluation against fully defined ground truth.

Indexed as

AortaConvolutional Neural NetworksImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance AngiographySupervised Machine LearningBlood Flow VelocityHemodynamicsHumansPredictive Value of TestsRegional Blood FlowReproducibility of ResultsTime Factors4D flow MRICardiovascular magnetic resonanceConvolutional neural networkImage segmentationImage synthesisTime-resolved aortic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42025769
PMCPMC13253120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.