ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2026
A Randomized Trial of Rifaximin vs Low Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, and Polyols Diet for Symptom Outcomes and Microbiome Changes in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03219528 (A Longitudinal Study to Identify IBS Phenotypes Using Fecal Microbiota and Hydrogen Breath Testing), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Longitudinal Study to Identify IBS Phenotypes Using Fecal Microbiota and Hydrogen Breath Testing
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsThe low Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, And Polyols (FODMAP) diet (LFD) and rifaximin are effective in <50% individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), highlighting the need to identify predictors of treatment response. We therefore conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing LFD and rifaximin to identify microbial predictors of response.
methodsSixty-five adults with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) were randomized to LFD or rifaximin for 5 weeks. Primary endpoints were changes in mean daily abdominal pain and bloating at week 5 vs baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in IBS Symptom Severity Score and Bristol Stool Form Scale at week 5 vs baseline. Exploratory endpoints included responders defined as ≥30% reduction in abdominal pain or bloating. Stool samples collected at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 5 underwent 16S rRNA sequencing, and glucose breath testing (BT) was performed at weeks 0 and 5.
resultsBoth LFD and rifaximin significantly improved abdominal pain (-0.29 with LFD vs -0.24 points/week with rifaximin); bloating (-0.29 vs -0.19 per week); and IBS Symptom Severity Score (-14.2 vs -13.3 per week) at week 5 (all P < .0001), with no significant change in Bristol Stool Form Scale. BT results were inconsistent predictors of response, with positive baseline hydrogen BT associated with lower odds of rifaximin response, and methane conversion at week 5 showed discordant associations with rifaximin response. In contrast, distinct baseline taxa were associated with treatment response. LFD responders had lower abundance of putative saccharolytic taxa (Butyricimonas, Bacteroides, Intestinibacter), whereas rifaximin responders were enriched in taxa with putative short-chain fatty acid-producing and bile acid-modifying potential (Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, Odoribacter). Nonresponders exhibited enrichment of putative proteolytic taxa (Bilophila, Alistipes, Prevotella).
conclusionsLFD and rifaximin are equally effective for IBS-D, with distinct microbial predictors of response. However, these findings require validation before informing personalized treatment approaches. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT03219528.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.