Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42025609›Full record

ArticleComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society2026

Convolutional-transformer fusion of ultrasound and diffuse optical tomography for breast lesion classification.

Minghao Xue, Debbie Bennett, Ian S Hagemann, Jaimee Mannix, Kimberly Wiele, Albert Tang, Md Iqbal Hossain, Steven P Poplack, Quing Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minghao XueBiomedical Engineering Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Debbie BennettDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Ian S HagemannDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Jaimee MannixDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Kimberly WieleDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Albert TangBiomedical Engineering Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Md Iqbal HossainBiomedical Engineering Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA; Imaging Science Program, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Steven P PoplackDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine , 300 Pasteur Drive Stanford, CA 94305,USA.
Quing ZhuBiomedical Engineering Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA; Imaging Science Program, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. Electronic address: zhu.q@wustl.edu.

Funding

Improving diagnostic US for reduction of benign breast biopsies using US-guided Optical TomographyR01CA228047 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POPLACK, STEVEN, ZHU, QUING · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate breast cancer diagnosis remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. This study presents a deep learning fusion framework that integrates high-resolution ultrasound (US) images with low-resolution diffuse optical tomography (DOT) total hemoglobin (HbT) images to improve diagnostic performance and reduce unnecessary benign biopsies. A cohort of 287 patients who underwent US and US-guided DOT imaging before biopsy of suspicious breast lesions was analyzed. A novel Convolutional-Transformer-Translator (CTT) fusion model was developed to automatically combine complementary US and DOT images for lesion classification. Standalone US and DOT models achieved mean areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of 0.829 and 0.830, respectively, whereas the CTT model reached an AUC of 0.946, surpassing radiologist assessments using standard Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and DOT-enhanced BI-RADS. At a matched sensitivity of 98%, the CTT model achieved biopsy specificity of 41.22%, compared with 8.59% for standard BI-RADS and 30.28% for DOT-enhanced BI-RADS evaluated by four study radiologists. The proposed CTT model was also compared with ten state-of-the-art classification models and demonstrated superior performance. These findings highlight the potential of the CTT fusion framework to improve breast lesion diagnostic accuracy and reduce benign biopsies in clinical workflows.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTomography, OpticalUltrasonography, MammaryConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityBreast cancerDeep learningDiagnosisDiffuse optical tomographyFusion model

Identifiers

PMID42025609
PMCPMC13276924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.